Limitation of Though

 Is there an action not born of thought?

We as a whole realize that our activity depends on ideas, with every one of its results. Presently, were asking, is there an activity, is there a method of carrying on within day-to-day existence, in which thought doesn't work. There is an activity, an aggregate, complete, all-encompassing, entire activity, where thought doesn't meddle, by any stretch of the imagination which thought doesn’t interfere, at all.

Limitation of Though 

Do we see obviously, every last one of us, any place we are, whatever our circumstance whatever our molding, but masochist we are the greater part of us do we see, unmistakably, that thought, under all circumstances, is limited? 

Not a verbal acceptance of it, but an actual fact, which you, in your blood, see it, irrevocably? Then, at that point, in the event that you see that, not as a thought, not as a decision, not a thing contemplated out and accordingly it is, if you do, it actually thought. So, when you realize that thought is completely, wholly limited, and from that limitation all activity, whatever type it is, must be limited, and therefore, in a human relationship it creates havoc, misery, from there, you ask the question. Not if you haven’t done all this. And you can do all this, instantly, not take time, years, months. Then, at that point, you can ask, is there an insight, without memory, without recognitions, completely separated from the past, is there perception and, in this manner, out of that perception activity. Our activity depends on memory. Either philosophical memory, a Utopian memory, or recollections of past activities which have made specific imprints on the cerebrum, and all such activities should be persistently dangerous in human relationships.

Our action is based on memory. Either ideological memory, a Utopian memory, or memories of past actions which have left certain marks on the brain, and all such activity must be continuously destructive in human relationships. In the event that I love you since you have been wonderful to me, which is, you have given me something, physically or along these lines, or that, which is from memory, with the pleasure of it, I say, ‘I love you.’ So, is there a love, which is not born of memory, which is not the result of giving and take, which is not sensation? Obviously, there must be. There should be. Or this is all we know? Let’s put it that way. This thing that we call love, is all this. Furthermore, that affection breeds desire, nervousness, possessiveness, connection, you follow? And out of all that, there is a great misery. And is that misery loved? In case that isn't loving, and you have completely deserted envy, outrage, all that, that which is left, totally, that is love.

 

Thus, similarly, if one comprehends the entire development of thought, as measure and time, and conceived out of the past and, hence, perpetually diminished, restricted, limited. If you see that, very clearly, and, therefore, abandon it, then you have what one may call insight, we mean by that word, according to the dictionary, to have a sight in something, a quick view of truth in that which is being discussed. That is, you have conversed with me about the limit of thought. You have talked to me. I’ve listened to you with all my energy because, perhaps, there is a new way of living, a new way of action, and I’ve realized my actions have always been bringing such sorrow, confusion and misery. And I’ve listened to you. And if you say to me, ‘Have you really seen the truth that thought is limited? its reality, not its possibility. Seeing its reality, is to have understanding. That knowledge isn't memory, isn't though, isn't an out thing of the past. You see straightforwardly the reality of it and from that, there is activity, which is finished. Thus, do you, as an individual, and you who are the delegate of all mankind so you are the world. Assuming you see the reality of this, that reality will act on the planet. You don’t act.

Thus, we have seen the naughtiness of thought which is restricted, which has made the individual, and something contrary to non-distinction which is despotism, authority, and the remainder of it. We have likewise seen that idea, amassed in the cerebrum as memory, information, those very synapses have become restricted. Be that as it may, when you have an understanding of this, the very synapses are not generally a restricted world Assuming you see the reality of this, that reality will act on the planet. You don’t act.

Along these lines, we have seen the underhandedness of thought which is restricted, which has made the individual, and something contrary to non-singularity which is despotism, authority, and the remainder of it. We have additionally seen that idea, accumulated in the mind as memory, information, those very synapses have become restricted. However, when you have a knowledge into this, the very synapses are not generally restricted. The synapses are working absolutely in an unexpected way. Would you be able to see reality that information has its place, innovatively, and has no other spot, mentally, which is to enroll? Thus, on the off chance that you see reality that enrollment, similar to hurt, brings tight activity, restricted activity, from which disdain, viciousness, and the remainder of it. Assuming you see its reality, you’ll have a knowledge, you’ll have an understanding into the entire development of thought.

Therefore, thought then limits, naturally, itself and remains there. You don’t have to say, ‘I must stop thinking – that’s too silly. When you understand thought as a measure, the measure being comparison and the whole.